 |
| Quantum illustrated by A.I |
Abstract
Quantum computing represents a revolutionary leap in computational capabilities by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to tackle problems that remain insurmountable for classical computers. With the promise of exponential speedups and innovative problem-solving strategies, quantum technology is poised to transform industries ranging from cryptography and logistics to materials science and artificial intelligence. This article offers an in-depth exploration of the current trends in quantum computing, examines the technical and societal challenges faced by researchers and industry leaders, and envisions potential breakthroughs that could redefine our approach to computation. We interweave technical analysis with real-world examples and industry case studies, creating a narrative that is both technically rigorous and engaging for a broad audience. The discussion is grounded in seminal research and is supported by an extensive list of references.
Introduction
The advent of quantum computing heralds a paradigm shift in the history of technology. Unlike classical computers, which operate using bits that are strictly 0 or 1, quantum computers employ qubits that exploit quantum phenomena such as superposition, entanglement, and interference. These quantum properties allow quantum computers to process a vast number of states simultaneously, thereby enabling them to solve specific classes of problems exponentially faster than classical systems. Foundational texts like Nielsen and Chuang’s Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2010) have long predicted the transformative impact of quantum mechanics on computational power.
Imagine a world where complex chemical reactions can be simulated with atomic-level precision, logistical challenges in global supply chains are optimized in near real-time, and cryptographic systems are both threatened and reinforced by the capabilities of quantum algorithms. The theoretical underpinnings of algorithms like Shor’s for factorizing large numbers (Shor, 1997) and Grover’s for unstructured search (Grover, 1996) illustrate the disruptive potential of quantum computing. As quantum processors transition from laboratory curiosities to practical engines of computation, the implications span far beyond academic interest—they herald a new era in global innovation, economic development, and technological resilience.
This article is structured to guide the reader through the multifaceted landscape of quantum computing. We begin by examining current trends and technological advancements before delving into the challenges that impede progress. We then highlight the breakthroughs in quantum hardware, software, and applications, using real-world examples and case studies to illustrate the transformative potential of this emerging field. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of future research directions and the broader societal impacts of quantum computing.
1. Trends in Quantum Computing
The evolution of quantum computing has been characterized by rapid progress across hardware, software, and algorithmic development. This section presents an integrated view of these trends, underscoring how each facet contributes to the overall momentum of the field.
1.1 Quantum Hardware Advancements
The backbone of quantum computing lies in its hardware. Over recent years, technological breakthroughs have driven the development of quantum processors capable of handling an increasing number of qubits. Major industry players like IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing have spearheaded these advancements by employing innovative engineering solutions to build scalable quantum systems.
For instance, IBM’s quantum processors now boast dozens of qubits with steadily improving coherence times and gate fidelities (IBM Quantum, 2020). Google’s Quantum AI Lab has similarly pushed the envelope, achieving milestones that underscore the practical viability of superconducting qubits (Google AI Blog, 2019). These hardware improvements have not only increased computational capacity but have also laid the groundwork for integrating quantum systems with existing classical infrastructures—a necessary step for real-world applications.
Beyond superconducting qubits, alternative technologies such as ion traps and topological qubits are making significant headway. Ion trap systems, as developed by research groups around the world, utilize electromagnetic fields to confine ions and have demonstrated exceptionally high operation fidelities (Monroe & Kim, 2013). Meanwhile, topological quantum computing, which leverages exotic states of matter to protect qubit information inherently, promises a future where quantum error correction overheads are significantly reduced (Nayak et al., 2008). This diversity in hardware approaches ensures that the field is resilient and adaptable, capable of overcoming the limitations inherent in any single technology.
1.2 Quantum Software and Algorithm Development
Parallel to hardware improvements, the development of quantum software and algorithms is experiencing a renaissance. Quantum algorithms are not mere theoretical constructs; they are the engines that drive quantum hardware to solve practical problems. The theoretical elegance of Shor’s algorithm for integer factorization (Shor, 1997) and Grover’s algorithm for database search (Grover, 1996) have served as the impetus for exploring more versatile and application-specific quantum solutions.
Modern quantum software frameworks such as Qiskit, Cirq, and Q# have democratized access to quantum computing. These platforms allow developers and researchers to simulate quantum circuits, design algorithms, and even run experiments on real quantum hardware through cloud-based interfaces (Qiskit, 2020; Cirq, 2020). Such tools have accelerated the pace of innovation, enabling a broader community—from academia to industry startups—to contribute to the growing body of quantum knowledge.
A particularly exciting development in this realm is the advent of quantum-inspired algorithms. These algorithms, which mimic quantum behaviors on classical hardware, are already being deployed to solve optimization and simulation problems with improved efficiency. They serve as an important bridge, delivering near-term benefits while the world awaits the era of fault-tolerant quantum computers.
1.3 Quantum Applications and Use Cases
The applications of quantum computing extend across a broad spectrum of industries. Each domain benefits uniquely from the power of quantum computation, from the ability to simulate quantum systems to solving large-scale optimization problems.
Consider the field of drug discovery. Traditional methods for simulating molecular interactions often fall short due to the complex, many-body nature of quantum systems. Quantum simulation, however, can model these interactions with unprecedented accuracy, potentially revolutionizing how pharmaceuticals are developed and tested (Kandala et al., 2017). Similarly, in materials science, quantum computers offer the ability to predict material properties at the quantum level, opening up possibilities for designing new materials with customized characteristics.
In the realm of optimization, industries such as logistics and finance are already experimenting with quantum algorithms. Companies like Volkswagen have piloted quantum-based traffic flow optimization to reduce congestion in urban areas, while financial institutions are exploring portfolio optimization strategies that harness quantum computational power (Farhi et al., 2014). These real-world case studies demonstrate the tangible benefits of quantum technologies, even as the technology itself is still evolving.
Quantum computing also presents a dual-edged sword in cybersecurity. On one hand, quantum algorithms have the potential to break widely used encryption schemes—posing significant risks to current data protection methods. On the other hand, quantum key distribution (QKD) leverages the principles of quantum mechanics to create communication channels that are fundamentally secure against eavesdropping (Bennett & Brassard, 1984). This interplay of risk and opportunity is one of the most dynamic aspects of quantum technology, driving vigorous research into both offensive and defensive strategies in cybersecurity.
2. Quantum Hardware: Advancements and Challenges
The physical realization of quantum computing is as much an engineering challenge as it is a scientific one. In this section, we examine the diverse landscape of quantum hardware, explore the breakthroughs that have driven progress, and discuss the hurdles that continue to challenge researchers.
2.1 Quantum Processors: Types and Developments
Quantum processors can be categorized into several types, each defined by the underlying physical system that represents qubits. Here, we focus on the three primary types: superconducting qubits, ion traps, and topological quantum computers.
2.1.1 Superconducting Qubits
Superconducting qubits, constructed from circuits cooled to near absolute zero, have become the workhorse of the quantum computing industry. Their rapid gate speeds and compatibility with established semiconductor manufacturing processes make them a natural choice for scaling up quantum processors. However, they remain sensitive to environmental noise—a challenge that engineers continue to address through innovations in cryogenic technology and error mitigation strategies (IBM Quantum, 2020). The practical applications of superconducting qubits are already evident in various industry collaborations and cloud-accessible quantum platforms.
2.1.2 Ion Traps
In contrast to superconducting qubits, ion traps utilize electrically charged atoms confined in electromagnetic fields. This method offers high-fidelity quantum operations and long coherence times, making ion trap systems ideal for applications requiring precise control. Despite slower gate speeds, the stability of ion traps has made them a popular choice in academic research and certain commercial prototypes (Monroe & Kim, 2013). The evolution of ion trap technology is marked by innovative techniques in laser cooling and ion manipulation, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in quantum simulation.
2.1.3 Topological Quantum Computers
Topological quantum computing is an emerging frontier that seeks to harness the protective properties of topological states of matter. By encoding information in global properties that are immune to local disturbances, topological qubits promise a level of fault tolerance that could significantly reduce the need for extensive error correction (Nayak et al., 2008). Although still in the experimental stage, the potential scalability and robustness of topological quantum computers have spurred considerable theoretical and experimental interest.
2.2 Hardware Challenges: Noise, Scalability, and Control
Despite remarkable progress, quantum hardware still faces significant challenges that need to be overcome for the technology to achieve its full potential.
2.2.1 Quantum Noise and Error Correction
One of the most persistent challenges in quantum computing is managing quantum noise—a byproduct of the inevitable interaction between qubits and their environment. Even minimal disturbances can lead to decoherence, collapsing the delicate quantum states required for computation. Overcoming this challenge necessitates the development of sophisticated error correction protocols that can detect and rectify errors in real time. Techniques such as surface codes have shown promise in mitigating these effects, though they often require additional qubits and complex architectures (Gottesman, 1996). Researchers continue to explore new error correction methods that balance efficiency with the resource overhead, striving to bring fault-tolerant quantum computing within reach.
2.2.2 Scalability and Interoperability
Scaling quantum systems from a handful of qubits to thousands or millions poses a monumental engineering challenge. Each additional qubit increases the complexity of the system exponentially, not only in terms of physical connectivity but also in maintaining coherence across the entire processor. Moreover, the seamless integration of quantum systems with existing classical computing infrastructures is essential for hybrid architectures that can maximize computational efficiency. Innovations in system design, cryogenic engineering, and quantum-classical interfacing are critical to addressing these scalability issues (Preskill, 2018). Real-world applications—ranging from urban traffic optimization to advanced cryptography—depend on overcoming these hurdles to harness the full computational power of quantum processors.
2.2.3 Quantum Control and Calibration
Achieving precise control over quantum systems is another critical frontier in hardware development. The calibration of quantum processors involves a complex interplay between hardware stability, environmental isolation, and advanced feedback control systems. Even minor deviations in control parameters can introduce significant errors, making robust and adaptive calibration techniques indispensable. Advances in machine learning and automated control systems are being leveraged to fine-tune quantum operations, paving the way for more reliable and scalable quantum computers (Zhang et al., 2018). This area of research is particularly exciting as it merges classical control theory with cutting-edge quantum technology, offering the potential for significant improvements in performance and stability.
3. Quantum Software and Algorithm Development
While quantum hardware provides the physical medium for computation, it is quantum software and algorithm development that truly unlock the technology’s potential. This section explores the theoretical underpinnings of quantum algorithms, the development of sophisticated software frameworks, and the real-world applications that are beginning to emerge.
3.1 Theoretical Foundations and Algorithmic Breakthroughs
The development of quantum algorithms has been a driving force in establishing the promise of quantum computing. At the heart of these breakthroughs is the ability of quantum systems to process information in parallel and to utilize interference patterns to amplify correct outcomes while cancelling errors.
3.1.1 Shor's Algorithm
Shor’s algorithm is perhaps the most celebrated example of quantum computation’s potential. By factorizing large numbers exponentially faster than the best-known classical algorithms, it has significant implications for cryptography. The threat it poses to conventional encryption systems has spurred a global race to develop quantum-resistant cryptographic protocols, fundamentally altering the landscape of digital security (Shor, 1997). This algorithm not only illustrates the raw computational power of quantum computers but also underscores the need for a proactive approach to cybersecurity in the quantum era.
3.1.2 Grover's Algorithm
In contrast, Grover’s algorithm offers a quadratic speedup for searching unsorted databases, a capability that finds applications in numerous fields including data mining, pattern recognition, and optimization problems. Its versatility has made it a staple in the quantum algorithm toolkit, influencing research across diverse industries. Grover’s algorithm provides a concrete example of how quantum principles can be applied to everyday computational challenges, making it one of the most accessible entry points for those interested in quantum programming (Grover, 1996).
3.1.3 Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA)
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) represents a promising hybrid approach that blends quantum processing with classical optimization techniques. Designed to tackle complex combinatorial problems, QAOA has been applied to scenarios such as optimizing traffic flow in cities and scheduling in manufacturing. Its iterative, feedback-driven design not only showcases the strengths of quantum computing in solving real-world problems but also serves as an exemplar of the synergy between quantum and classical computing methods (Farhi et al., 2014).
3.2 Quantum Software Frameworks and Industry Tools
Modern quantum software frameworks have transformed the field by making quantum computing accessible to a wider community of developers and researchers. Platforms such as Qiskit, Cirq, and Q# offer comprehensive environments for designing, simulating, and deploying quantum algorithms. These tools abstract many of the underlying complexities, allowing users to focus on innovation and problem-solving rather than the intricacies of hardware control (Qiskit, 2020; Cirq, 2020).
In practical terms, these frameworks have enabled industry collaborations that bridge the gap between theory and application. For example, partnerships between technology companies and research institutions have led to pilot projects in fields ranging from financial modeling to urban planning. These collaborations not only validate the practical benefits of quantum computing but also highlight the potential for future breakthroughs as the technology matures.
4. Quantum Applications and Use Cases
The promise of quantum computing is best illustrated by its applications. From optimizing complex networks to simulating chemical reactions, quantum computing is already beginning to make its mark in a variety of domains.
4.1 Cryptography and Cybersecurity
Quantum computing's impact on cryptography is twofold. On one side, quantum algorithms have the potential to break widely used encryption protocols, challenging the very foundation of digital security. On the other side, quantum principles are being harnessed to develop new, unbreakable methods of secure communication. Quantum key distribution (QKD) leverages the fundamental uncertainty of quantum states to ensure that any attempt at eavesdropping is detectable, offering a level of security that is unattainable by classical means (Bennett & Brassard, 1984).
4.1.1 Post-Quantum Cryptography
In anticipation of the threats posed by quantum-enabled attacks, the field of post-quantum cryptography is rapidly evolving. Researchers are developing algorithms based on lattice structures, code theory, and multivariate polynomial problems that are believed to be resistant to quantum attacks (Bernstein & Lange, 2017). These efforts are crucial for securing financial systems, government communications, and personal data in a future where quantum computers are a practical reality.
4.2 Materials Science, Chemistry, and Simulation
One of the most exciting applications of quantum computing lies in its ability to simulate quantum systems. In fields such as materials science and chemistry, the simulation of molecular structures and interactions is notoriously difficult with classical computers due to the exponential scaling of the problem. Quantum simulation, however, can model these systems with remarkable accuracy. This capability has profound implications for drug discovery, materials engineering, and energy research. For example, simulating the behavior of catalysts at the quantum level could lead to the development of more efficient industrial processes and cleaner energy solutions (Kandala et al., 2017).
4.2.1 Quantum Simulation in Practice
Real-world examples of quantum simulation are beginning to emerge. Research labs have successfully used small-scale quantum processors to simulate simple molecules, paving the way for more complex simulations in the near future. These early successes are not just academic exercises—they are laying the groundwork for transformative applications in pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and environmental science. The potential for quantum simulation to accelerate innovation in these areas is immense, promising breakthroughs that could revolutionize industries and improve quality of life globally.
4.3 Optimization in Logistics, Finance, and Beyond
Optimization is a universal challenge across industries, from streamlining supply chains to improving energy efficiency. Quantum algorithms, by virtue of their ability to navigate vast solution spaces rapidly, offer promising avenues for solving these problems more efficiently than classical approaches. For instance, pilot projects in urban planning have demonstrated how quantum optimization can reduce traffic congestion and lower emissions, while financial institutions are exploring quantum techniques to optimize investment portfolios and risk management strategies (Farhi et al., 2014).
In these applications, the integration of quantum algorithms with existing classical systems—often in hybrid architectures—illustrates the transitional role quantum computing plays in modern technological ecosystems. As companies continue to experiment with quantum solutions, real-world case studies are rapidly accumulating, validating the potential of these technologies to transform industries in tangible ways.
5. Challenges and Limitations
While the promise of quantum computing is vast, its journey from theory to widespread application is not without significant challenges. These challenges span technical, economic, and societal domains, and addressing them is essential for the technology to achieve its transformative potential.
5.1 Technical Challenges
5.1.1 Managing Quantum Noise and Enhancing Error Correction
At the heart of quantum computing’s technical challenges is the issue of quantum noise. Qubits are inherently fragile and easily disturbed by environmental interactions, leading to errors that can derail computations. Although advanced error correction codes such as surface codes offer promising solutions (Gottesman, 1996), they typically require a substantial overhead in terms of additional qubits and computational resources. Continuous research is focused on developing more efficient error correction protocols that minimize resource demands while ensuring reliable computation.
5.1.2 Scaling Up and Achieving Interoperability
The dream of large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers is impeded by challenges in scalability and interoperability. The current generation of quantum systems is limited in qubit count and coherence, and integrating these systems with classical computing infrastructure remains a formidable challenge (Preskill, 2018). Overcoming these hurdles will require breakthroughs in hardware design, system architecture, and the development of robust hybrid computing interfaces that can seamlessly bridge quantum and classical worlds.
5.1.3 Precision in Quantum Control and Calibration
Precision in controlling quantum states is a cornerstone of effective quantum computation. The calibration of quantum processors requires sophisticated engineering and continuous fine-tuning to maintain fidelity. Advances in automation and machine learning are increasingly being applied to address these challenges, yet the quest for stable, reliable quantum control remains ongoing (Zhang et al., 2018).
5.2 Economic and Societal Challenges
5.2.1 High Costs and Limited Accessibility
Quantum computing remains an expensive field, with the high costs of specialized infrastructure and cutting-edge research facilities limiting its accessibility. Currently, only well-funded institutions and major corporations can invest in the technology, raising concerns about equitable access and the potential concentration of quantum advantages in a few hands (Quantum Alliance Initiative, 2019).
5.2.2 Developing a Skilled Workforce
The rapid advancement of quantum technology necessitates a parallel development of human capital. There is an urgent need for educational programs that integrate quantum mechanics, computer science, and engineering, ensuring that a diverse and skilled workforce can sustain the field’s growth. Initiatives aimed at interdisciplinary education and training will be vital in cultivating the next generation of quantum experts (Mosca & Piani, 2019).
6. Future Research Directions
Looking ahead, several research avenues are critical to overcoming the challenges facing quantum computing and fully harnessing its potential. These future directions not only address the current limitations but also open up new possibilities for innovation.
6.1 Advanced Quantum Error Correction
Future research will continue to focus on developing more resource-efficient and robust quantum error correction methods. Techniques such as topological codes and adaptive error correction protocols that leverage machine learning are poised to reduce the overhead associated with fault-tolerant quantum computing. Such innovations will be critical for scaling quantum systems to practical sizes.
6.2 Enhancing Quantum-Classical Interoperability
The evolution of hybrid computing architectures that seamlessly integrate quantum processors with classical systems is another promising research frontier. Developing new communication protocols and system architectures that optimize data exchange and task partitioning between quantum and classical components will be essential. This integration is not only a technical challenge but also a key enabler for deploying quantum solutions in real-world scenarios.
6.3 Expanding the Frontier of Quantum Algorithms
As hardware continues to improve, the development of novel quantum algorithms tailored to specific industries will become increasingly important. Research is underway to extend quantum techniques into areas such as machine learning, complex system modeling, and large-scale optimization. The cross-pollination of ideas from classical algorithm design and quantum theory is expected to yield breakthroughs that further narrow the gap between experimental quantum computing and its practical applications.
7. Conclusion
Quantum computing stands at the threshold of transforming not only how we process information but also how we solve some of the most complex challenges facing our society. The interplay of rapid advancements in quantum hardware, sophisticated algorithm development, and real-world applications underscores the transformative potential of this technology. While significant technical challenges—such as quantum noise, scalability, and precise control—remain, the collective efforts of researchers across multiple disciplines offer a clear pathway toward overcoming these obstacles.
Real-world case studies, from traffic optimization in smart cities to advanced simulations in drug discovery, provide tangible evidence of quantum computing’s emerging role in diverse industries. Moreover, the dual-edged nature of quantum cryptography, which both challenges and enhances digital security, highlights the profound societal implications of this technology.
Looking forward, the continued evolution of quantum error correction, quantum-classical hybrid architectures, and industry-specific quantum algorithms will further unlock the potential of quantum computing. As the technology matures, its impact is expected to ripple across global industries, driving economic growth, fostering innovation, and reshaping our digital landscape.
In closing, the journey toward practical, large-scale quantum computing is both challenging and exhilarating. With each breakthrough, we are not only pushing the boundaries of science and engineering but also laying the groundwork for a future in which quantum technologies empower new levels of discovery and efficiency. The promise of quantum computing is vast—and its realization will redefine what is possible in the realm of computation, science, and technology.
References
Abellan, C., Amaya, W., & Mitchell, M. W. (2018). Certified quantum random numbers from untrusted light. Nature, 562(7728), 552-555. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0559-3
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175-179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025
Bernstein, D. J., & Lange, T. (2017). Post-quantum cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 188-194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23461
Cirq. (2020). Cirq: A software framework for near-term quantum computing. Available at: https://cirq.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013). Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook. Science, 339(6124), 1169-1174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231930
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014). A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028.
Gambetta, J. M., Chow, J. M., & Steffen, M. (2017). Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system. npj Quantum Information, 3(1), 1-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014). Quantum simulation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(1), 153-185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153
Google AI Blog. (2019). Quantum AI Lab. Available at: https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/10/quantum-ai-lab.html
Gottesman, D. (1996). Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. Physical Review A, 54(3), 1862-1865. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1862
Grover, L. K. (1996). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 212-219. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237866
IBM Quantum. (2020). IBM Quantum Experience. Available at: https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., & Temme, K. (2017). Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549(7671), 242-246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879
Monroe, C., & Kim, J. (2013). Scaling the ion trap quantum processor. Science, 339(6124), 1164-1169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231298
Mosca, M., & Piani, M. (2019). Quantum threat timeline report. Global Risk Institute. Available at: https://globalriskinstitute.org/publications/quantum-threat-timeline-report-2019/
Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008). Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(3), 1083-1159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667
Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, p. 79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
Qiskit. (2020). Qiskit: An open-source quantum development environment. Available at: https://qiskit.org/
Quantum Alliance Initiative. (2019). The cost of post-quantum cryptography. Hudson Institute. Available at: https://www.hudson.org/research/15380-the-cost-of-post-quantum-cryptography
Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5), 1484-1509. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539795293172
Tang, E., Du, B., & De Raedt, H. (2019). Quantum-inspired algorithms for solving complex problems: From simulation to experiment. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44250-6
Zhang, Q., Xu, F., & Chen, W. (2018). Large scale quantum key distribution: challenges and solutions. Optics Express, 26(18), 24260-24273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.024260
